I once heard the great Chicago writer Stuart Dybek say, āA story is always talking to you; you just have to learn to listen to it.ā Revising like this is a way of listening to the story and of having faith in it: it wants to be its best self, and if youāre patient with it, in time, it will be. Essentially, the whole process is: intuition plus iteration.
Related Quotes
If you know where a story is going, donāt hoard it. Make the story go there, now. But then what? What will you do next? Youāve surrendered your big reveal. Exactly. Often, in our doubt that we have a real story to tell, we hold something back, fearing that we donāt have anything else. And this can be a form of trickery. Surrendering that thing is a leap of faith that forces the story to attention, saying to it, in effect, āYou have to do better than that, and now that Iāve denied you your trick, your first-order solution, I know that you will.
A story is a frank, intimate conversation between equals. We keep reading because we continue to feel respected by the writer. We feel her, over there on the production end of the process, imagining that we are as intelligent and worldly and curious as she is. Because sheās paying attention to where we are (to where sheās put us), she knows when we are āexpecting a changeā or āfeeling skeptical of this new developmentā or āgetting tired of this episode.ā (She also knows when sheās delighted us and that, in that state, weāre slightly more open to whatever sheāll do next.)
So we might understand revision as a way of practicing relationship; seeing what, when we do it, improves the relationship between ourselves and the reader. What makes it more intense, direct, and honest? What drives it into the ditch? The exciting thing is that weāre not doomed to ask these questions abstractly; we get to ask them locally, by running our meter over the phrases, sentences, sections, etc., that make up our story, while assuming some continuity of reaction between the reader and ourselves.
I once asked Ethan Canin to tell me the most valuable thing he knew about writing, and without hesitation he said, "Nothing is as important as a likable narrator. Nothing holds a story together better." I think heās right. If your narrator is someone whose take on things fascinates you, it isnāt really going to matter if nothing much happens for a long time.
Thereās one more thing that happens as I listen to life stories. I realize Iām not just listening to other peopleās stories; Iām helping them create their stories. Very few of us sit down one day and write out the story of our lives and then go out and recite it when somebody asks. For most of us itās only when somebody asks us to tell a story about ourselves that we have to step back and organize the events and turn them into a coherent narrative. When you ask somebody to tell part of their story, youāre giving them an occasion to take that step back. Youāre giving them an opportunity to construct an account of themselves and maybe see themselves in a new way. None of us can have an identity unless it is affirmed and acknowledged by others. So as you are telling me your story, youāre seeing the ways I affirm you and the ways I do not. Youāre sensing the parts of the story that work and those that do not. If you feed me empty slogans about yourself, I withdraw. But if you stand more transparently before me, showing both your warts and your gifts, you feel my respectful and friendly gaze upon you, and that brings forth growth. In every life there is a pattern, a story line running through it all. We find that story when somebody gives an opportunity to tell it.