We might imagine a story as a room-sized black box. The writerâs goal is to have the reader go into that box in one state of mind and come out in another. What happens in there has to be thrilling and non-trivial.
Thatâs it.
What is the exact avor of the thrill? The writer doesnât have to know. Thatâs what heâs writing to find out.
Related Quotes
As weâve been saying, the story form is ruthlessly efficient. Everything in a story should be to purpose. Our working assumption is that nothing exists in a story by chance or merely to serve some documentary function. Every element should be a little poem, freighted with subtle meaning that is in connection with the storyâs purpose.
When a writer subjects us to a non-normative eventâa physical implausibility, the use of markedly elevated language (or markedly vernacular language), or a series of lengthy digressions in a Russian pub in which the people keep freezing in midaction for several pages so that each can be described at length, in turnâhe pays a price: our reading energy drops. (We get suspicious and resistant.) But if it doesnât drop fatally, and if, later, we see that this was all part of the planâif what seemed a failure of craft turns out to be integral to the storyâs meaning (that is, it seems that he âmeant to do thatâ)âthen all is forgiven and we might even understand the profitable exploitation of that apparent excess as a form of virtuosity.
The exciting part of all of this, to me, is that we always have a basis on which to proceed. The reader is out there, and sheâs real. Sheâs interested in life and, by picking up our work, has given us the benet of the doubt.
All we have to do is engage her.
To engage her, all we have to do is value her.
The boldness of this leap teaches us something important about the short story: it is not a documentary or rigorous accounting of the passage of time or a fair-minded attempt to show life as it is really lived; itâs a radically shaped, even somewhat cartoonish (when held up against the tedious real world) little machine that thrills us with the extremity of its decisiveness.
The kind of intuitive, line-by-line attention to editing weâve been talking aboutâthatâs what makes it more likely that what happens in there will be thrilling and non-trivial, that whatever happens in there will happen more crisply and denitively. And since, in every decision, Iâm proceeding by the question âDoes this delight me?â there should be some delight for you in there too.