But the story, in declining to answer (in obscuring the place where it might have answered), feels like itās not avoiding the question but irradiating it with increased intensity.
Related Quotes
A work of art moves us by being honest and that honesty is apparent in its language and its form and in its resistance to concealment.
When a writer subjects us to a non-normative eventāa physical implausibility, the use of markedly elevated language (or markedly vernacular language), or a series of lengthy digressions in a Russian pub in which the people keep freezing in midaction for several pages so that each can be described at length, in turnāhe pays a price: our reading energy drops. (We get suspicious and resistant.) But if it doesnāt drop fatally, and if, later, we see that this was all part of the planāif what seemed a failure of craft turns out to be integral to the storyās meaning (that is, it seems that he āmeant to do thatā)āthen all is forgiven and we might even understand the profitable exploitation of that apparent excess as a form of virtuosity.
A story is a frank, intimate conversation between equals. We keep reading because we continue to feel respected by the writer. We feel her, over there on the production end of the process, imagining that we are as intelligent and worldly and curious as she is. Because sheās paying attention to where we are (to where sheās put us), she knows when we are āexpecting a changeā or āfeeling skeptical of this new developmentā or āgetting tired of this episode.ā (She also knows when sheās delighted us and that, in that state, weāre slightly more open to whatever sheāll do next.)
The boldness of this leap teaches us something important about the short story: it is not a documentary or rigorous accounting of the passage of time or a fair-minded attempt to show life as it is really lived; itās a radically shaped, even somewhat cartoonish (when held up against the tedious real world) little machine that thrills us with the extremity of its decisiveness.
And letās note that weāre only asking these questions (which, in turn, are causing the story to ask questions about the nature of love) because the length of each relationship was specified by the story and because Chekhov ārememberedā or ātook the troubleā to vary this parameter.