We defined a âluck eventâ as one that meets three tests: First, you didnât cause it; second, it has a significant potential consequence, good or bad; and third, it has an element of surprise, some aspect of the event is unpredictable before it happens. Using this definition, the evidence showed a lot of luck in the history of these companies. Butâ and this is the crucial pointâwe also found comparable amounts of luck in the control set of comparison cases we studied! The big winners did not generally get more good luck, less bad luck, bigger spikes of luck, or better-timed luck than their comparisons. What the best achieved, instead, was a higher return on luck. Hansen and I learned that the question is not whether youâll get luck along the wayâyou certainly will get luck, both good luck and bad. The critical question is what you do with the luck that you get. Iâve come to believe that about 50 percent of great leadership is what you do with the unexpected.