Level 5 leaders who build the greatest and most durable companies think first about “who” and then about “what.” They first get the right people on the bus (and the wrong people off the bus) and then figure out where to drive the bus.

When you’re facing chaos, turbulence, disruption, and uncertainty, and you cannot possibly predict what’s coming around the corner, your best “strategy” is to have a busload of disciplined people who can adapt and perform brilliantly no matter what comes next. Our research supported what we came to call “Packard’s Law” (named in admiration after HP’s co-founder): No company can consistently grow faster than its ability to get enough of the right people and still become a great company. If a company consistently grows faster than its ability to get enough of the right people, it will not simply stagnate, it will fall. The number one metric to track isn’t revenue or profit or return on capital or cash flow; the number one metric is the percentage of key seats on the bus that are filled with right people for those seats. Everything depends on having the right people. (Directed reading: Good to Great, Chapter 3; BE 2.0, Chapter 2.)

In summary, growing a business is a dynamic process as the leadership team navigates the evolutions and revolutions of growth. And like the growth stages of a child, they are predictable and unavoidable. To deal with these challenges, the company must grow the capabilities of the leadership team throughout the organization; install scalable infrastructure to manage the increasing complexities that come with growth; and stay on top of the

market dynamics that affect the business.

To do this, there are 4 Decisions that leaders must address: People, Strategy,

Execution, and Cash.

Our pet peeve is when a company’s leaders think it should grow regardless of profit. This is just reckless, unless you’re a venture-backed firm pioneering new territory. For everyone else, we recommend getting profitable with the work you have, proving you can get to 15% profitability (based on our adjusted Simple Numbers), adding labor to knock profit back

to 10%, and then growing to 15% again. Lather, rinse, and repeat.

If you continue down the road you are on you will be counting on motivation to move the company forward. I cannot honestly recommend that as a way forward because business competition is not just a battle of strength and wills; it is also a competition over insights and competencies. My judgment is that motivation, by itself, will not give this company enough of an edge to achieve your goals.

McCracken’s “grow by 50 percent” is classic bad strategy. It is the kind of nonsense that passes for strategy in too many companies. First, he was setting a goal, not designing a way to deal with his company’s challenge. Second, growth is the outcome of a successful strategy, and attempts to engineer growth are exercises in magical thinking. In this case, the growth SGI engineered was accomplished by rolling up a number of other firms whose workstation strategies had also run out of steam.