Most great companies are formed to meet the goals and express the values of their founders, which is not always the same as maximizing shareholder wealth. For them, profit is simply a strategic necessity rather than the supreme end point.

This may be a jolting concept, we realize. But we’re certainly not the only management writers who have come to the same conclusion. Peter F. Drucker, in his classic text, Management: Task, Responsibilities, Practices, reached the same conclusion years ago:

Business cannot be defined or explained in terms of profit... The concept of profit maximization is, in fact, meaningless... The first test of any business is not the maximization of profit, but the achievement of sufficient profit to cover the risks of economic activity.

Level 5 leaders who build the greatest and most durable companies think first about “who” and then about “what.” They first get the right people on the bus (and the wrong people off the bus) and then figure out where to drive the bus.

When you’re facing chaos, turbulence, disruption, and uncertainty, and you cannot possibly predict what’s coming around the corner, your best “strategy” is to have a busload of disciplined people who can adapt and perform brilliantly no matter what comes next. Our research supported what we came to call “Packard’s Law” (named in admiration after HP’s co-founder): No company can consistently grow faster than its ability to get enough of the right people and still become a great company. If a company consistently grows faster than its ability to get enough of the right people, it will not simply stagnate, it will fall. The number one metric to track isn’t revenue or profit or return on capital or cash flow; the number one metric is the percentage of key seats on the bus that are filled with right people for those seats. Everything depends on having the right people. (Directed reading: Good to Great, Chapter 3; BE 2.0, Chapter 2.)

There are some people who will take personal advantage of every situation. There are some people in whom the dark side wins. Your company should rigorously weed these people out. You can do it with compassion (remember, it was your mistake to hire them in the first place); but it should be done.

Fortunately, these people are rare. And we don’t base this claim solely on a personal faith in human nature.

Businesses do not maximise anything. The most successful business leaders such as Marks or Walton or Gates pursued the unquantifiable, but entirely meaningful, objective of building a great business. A great business is very good at doing the things we expect it to do— rewarding its investors, providing satisfying employment, offering goods and services of good quality at reasonable prices, fulfilling a role in the community— and to fail in any of these is, in the long run, to fall in all of them.

When executives deliver that routine cliché of modern management – ‘Our people are our greatest asset’ – the commercial value of the collective intelligence developed within the corporation is probably what they have in mind. The asset is the capability of individuals and teams within the business to solve problems, to devise and deliver new products and to win

the commitment of suppliers and the trust of customers. Collective intelligence is the basis of the competitive advantage of most successful corporations, and it is enshrined in its people.