Our schemas are like guessing machines. Schemas help us predict what will happen and, consequently, how we should make decisions. The Enclave asks, âDidnât see that coming?â No, we didnât. Our guessing machines failed, which caused us to be surprised.
Emotions are elegantly tuned to help us deal with critical situations. They prepare us for different ways of acting and thinking. Weâve all heard that anger prepares us to fight and fear prepares us to flee. The linkages between emotion and behavior can be more subtle, though. For instance, a secondary effect of being angry, which was recently discovered by researchers, is that we become more certain of our judgments. When weâre angry, we know weâre right, as anyone who has been in a relationship can attest.
Related Quotes
Over the centuries many philosophers assumed that reason is separate from emotionsâ reason is the cool, prudential charioteer, and emotions are the hard-to-control stallions. None of that is true. Emotions contain information. Unless they are out of control, emotions are supple mental faculties that help you steer through life. Emotions assign value to things; they tell you what you want and donât want.â (Brooks, âHow to Know a
Personâ, p.145)
âThis emotional state alters your thinking so you are quick to look for danger. Emotions also tell you whether you are moving toward your goals or away from them. If I want to know you, itâs moderately important that I know what you think, but itâs very important that I have some sense of the flow of what you feel.
Early philosophers argued that we cannot perceive ourselves directly, rather ourselves must be âcaught in the actâ of perceiving something that exists in the real world. Self-knowledge, therefore, comes from our reactions to things that happen to us and around us. Just as we learn about other people by observing their behavior and making inferences from it, we learn about ourselves by examining what we do when events force our handâyet another reason why solitary introspection is insufficient and why experimenting provides more useful information than reflecting on past experience.
One of the primary ways in which unfreezing events mark a cut with the past and herald the start of a transition period, according to psychoanalyst Manfred Kets de Vries, is by serving as an organizing scheme for everything that occurs afterwards: âFrom this point on, every new disturbance is recognized as part of the same pattern of dissatisfaction,â he writes.
Stage Two: Interpret (Naming the Stakes)...
If you want to understand a situation as clearly as possible, you first need to make sense of whatâs at stake for you. Emotion is usually a sign that there is something important going on for you; if there wasnât, you wouldnât be feeling anything. An emotion could be related to an important goal in your life, a particular insecurity, or a relationship you cherish. Asking the question, Why am I getting emotional? is a good way to figure out whatâs at stake for you. If you see the stakes clearly, you may be able to interpret the situation more skillfullyâŚ
The important thing in the interpret stage is to expand our understanding beyond our initial automatic perception. To consider more perspectives, even if those perspectives are uncomfortable. To ask, What might I be overlooking here?
Again, this is a place where some attention to our own emotions can be helpful. When you feel a pulse of fear, a pulse of anger, or a sinking feeling in your stomach, think of it as a signal to inject some healthy curiosity into the situation, to ponder not only the stressor itself, but also your own emotional reality: Why am I feeling this way? Where are these emotions coming from? What is really at stake? What is so challenging for me about this situation?
We specifically asked research assistants who did not have extensive training in psychology to rate the emotions in these videos. Would these untrained observersâ natural human ability to recognize how others are feeling be useful in predicting stability in relationships?
Five years later, we checked back with the couples to see how they were doing. Some were still together, some were not. When we set their relationship status beside our research assistantsâ ratings of emotions in their earlier interactions, we found that the ratings predicted with close to 85 percent accuracy which couples had stayed together. This is consistent with many other studies showing that emotions between partners are a critical indicator of whether intimate relationships thrive or fail. The fact that raters with no special knowledge of psychology could accurately predict relationship strength was significant because it showed that most adults have a facility to accurately read emotions. Most of the raters had not yet experienced deep, longer-term relationships, yet when they looked closely, they could sense important, sometimes subtle emotions and behaviors in the couples. Emotions drive relationships, and noticing them matters.
Sometimes adults do too. Perhaps itâs because we have to make a choice so quickly that we donât have time to evaluate the options. Or maybe itâs because we let habit choose for us, the inertia of past choices carrying us through the present moment without exploring our options. Or maybe itâs just that we let our emotions make choices without even realizing itâ momentary anger, fear, or desire preempting evaluation and pushing us to act without thinking or reason.