As I thought about the general psychology of violence and protest in our country - in relation to both my clinical work and the particular milieu of my academic life - one word seemed to capture it all: alienation. Whether in relation to the state, communities, institutions, working environments, families, spouses - even one’s sense of self - it appeared to me that South African protestors were raging against an abiding disconnect between internal desire and external reality, or a state of alienation written into both the objective conditions of life in the external world, as well as their internal, subjective experiences of that world.

In fact, one of the things that people in this country find so utterly disorientating, is the banality of violence that surrounds them. The word ‘senseless’ is invoked repeatedly when describing violence in South Africa, which provides, paradoxically, an important clue for making sense of it. It is precisely the senselessness of the violence, in other words, that helps us comprehend it.

The point is this: as much as elite university culture can leave black students struggling with feelings of alienation, it is not the primary locus of the problem. Fallist rage originates in prior humiliations - misrecognitions - that are raced, classed and gendered in complex ways. Shame, after all, is hardwired into the chronicity of everyday and structural violence: unable to exact revenge, the original trauma that is structural violence is forgotten - but the sense of injury remains. It is picked at compulsively, eventually exploding without warning onto unwitting secondary targets.

To begin with, proponents of decolonisation almost never acknowledge one basic fact - that most poor and working-class students have suffered the indignity of being miseducated for twelve years of their lives. South Africa’s schooling system ranks consistently amongst the worst in the world and by the time these students enter elite universities, they are hopelessly prepared for academic life and struggle to cope with the unrelenting institutional demands. But instead of acknowledging these difficulties as areas for personal development, like Aesop’s fox they conclude that the grapes must be sour because they are unreachable.

Middle-class students in South Africa, that is, are becoming increasingly adept at identifying what we now call epistemological - or symbolic - violence, while appearing oblivious to the problem of real, concrete violence. We cannot blame them, of course, because the burden of responsibility rests with us as their bourgeois teacher.