James objected to the dissection of mental life into reaction times and what psychotherapist Gustav Fechner called âjust-noticeable differencesâ. Despite his belief in the possibility of a scientific psychology, James insisted that consciousness had a dynais, stream-like quality; he had no time for fundamentalist experimentalists whom he witheringly dismissed as âprism, pendulum and chronograph-philosophersâ.
Related Quotes
Durkheim had already suggested that societyâs space-time perceptions were a function of social rhythm and territory. That being so, one might imagine, the swifter and starker the transition between a rural universe pulsed by the seasons and an urban dispensation governed by the clock and industrial discipline, the greater the potential for disorientation as to time and space - the very bedrock of an individualâs mental well-being. Any such problem might be further exacerbated by the effect of fatigue on a personâs circadian rhythm.
Strangely enough, the science they are trusting in is about three hundred years behind the times. If their science conforms with what their senses tell them, they are subscribing to Newtonian views developed during the seventeenth century. This mechanistic science leads us to view humans as machines that respond to internal and external stimuli, each living in a separate corner of a larger machine: the physical universe. Such a view leads us to believe that we are completely separate, self-animating beings. Our bodies house brains, but our thoughts are only side products of our physical machines; consciousness, free will, divine purpose, and Essence are superfluous at best. The mechanistic view has led us to try and predict and control nature rather than harmonize with it. We strive rather than surrender.
In this state all is noise and chaos and devoid of meaning. It is difficult to imagine: our lives are so much more made up of light and sound and thoughts and feelings that form meaningful patterns and which help us to make sense of our lives and may grant us pleasure. The patient experiencing a psychotic episode is robbed of these harmonies. We cannot know the mind of another, and certainly not the mind of a psychotic other, but we can imagine that such noise, such a dissolution of meaning, would be intolerable. In this context it becomes understandable that a person in such a state should urgently seek to find or construct meanings and, in this process, to employ themes that are culturally or spiritually familiar - albeit often in deeply strange ways, given the disorder of mind.
The phantoms formed in the brains of men are also, necessarily, sublimates of their material life-process, which is empirically verifiable and bound to material premises. Morality, religion, metaphysics, and all the rest of ideology as well as the forms of consciousness corresponding to these, thus no longer retain the semblance of independence. They have no history, no development; but men, developing their material production and their material intercourse, alter, along with this their actual world, also their thinking and the products of their thinking. It is not consciousness that determines life, but life that determines consciousness.
In fact, just the other day I was sent an analysis of this phenomenon by Alan Lightman, physicist and writer:
By not giving ourselves the minutes â or hours â free of devices and distractions, we risk losing our ability to know who we are and whatâs distractions, we risk losing our ability to know who we are and whatâs important to us. The destruction of our inner selves via the wired world is a subtle phenomenon. The loss of slowness, of time for reflection and contemplation, of privacy and solitude, of silence, of the ability to sit quietly in a chair for fifteen minutes without external stimulation â all have happened quickly and almost invisibly.
The situation is dire. We are losing our ability to know who we are and what is important to us. We are creating a global machine in which each of us is a mindless and reflexive cog, relentlessly driven by the speed, noise, and artificial urgency of the wired world. I would like to make a bold proposal: that half our waking minds be designated and saved for quiet reflection.
We need a mental attitude that protects stillness, privacy, solitude, slowness, personal reflection; that honors the inner self; that allows each of us to wander about without schedule within our own minds.