A true differentiator can only be defined as something your competitor wonât do or canât do without great effort or expense. Often these can take years to develop since if it can be done cheaply, easily and quickly it provides little or no competitive advantage.
Related Quotes
All successful strategies take one of these two approaches, cost leadership or differentiation. Both cost leadership and differentiation can provide to the company a greater margin between revenue and costs than competitors can matchâthus producing a sustainable winning advantage (figure 4-1). This is ultimately the goal of any strategy.
In other words, life inside a cost leader looks very different from life inside a differentiator. In a cost leader, managers are forever looking to better understand the drivers of costs and are modifying their operations accordingly. In a differentiator, managers are forever attempting to deepen their holistic understanding of customers to learn how to serve them more distinctively. In a cost leader, cost reduction is relentlessly pursued, while in a differentiator, the brand is relentlessly built. Customers are seen and treated very differently. At a cost leader, nonconforming customersâthat is, customers who want something special and different from what the firm currently producesâare sacrificed to ensure standardization of the product or service, all in the pursuit of cost- effectiveness. At a differentiator, customers are jealously guarded. If customers indicate a desire for something different, the firm tries to design a new offering that the customers will adore.
And if a customer leaves, the departure drives a stake in the heart of the firm, indicating a failure of the strategy with that customer. It is as simple as the difference between Southwest Airlines and Apple.
Both cost leadership and differentiation require the pursuit of distinctiveness. You donât get to be a cost leader by producing your product or service exactly as your competitors do, and you donât get to be a differentiator by trying to produce a product or service
identical to your competitorsâ. To succeed in the long run, you must make thoughtful, creative decisions about how to win. In doing so, you enable your organization to sustainably provide a better value equation for consumers than competitors do and create competitive advantage.
At a high level, the choice is whether to be the low-cost player or a differentiator. But the how of each strategy will differ by context. Cost leaders can create advantage at many different pointsâsourcing, design, production, distribution, and so on. Differentiators can create a strong price premium on brand, on quality, on a particular kind of service, and so forth. Remember that there is no one single how-to-win choice for all companies. Even in a single market, it is possible to compete in many different ways and succeed. Choosing a how-to-win approach is a matter of thinking both broadly and deeply, in the context of the playing fields available to the company.
Whenever a company succeeds greatly there is a complementary story of impeded competitive response. Sometimes the impediment is the innovatorâs patent or similar protection, but more often it is an unwillingness or inability to replicate the innovatorâs policies.