I interrupt. And when I do, it trumpets: ‘I am better than you. I matter more.’ It has to mean I do not see you as my equal. Why else would I interrupt you?
I think we have to face it: to interrupt we first must abandon equality. We
must first assume that no matter what the person is saying, no matter what they are thinking, no matter what they are about to think, what we want to say is more valuable and in that moment we matter more than they do. We’re better.
And get this nuance: we are not assuming just that our idea is better; it well may be. We are assuming that deep down we deserve more than they do to speak right this second. If we didn’t assume that, we would listen. We would not speak until they had finished their thought. We would even stay interested in where they would go next, and where they would end up.