But isnât there some consent in being so directed, consent to a certain definition of what constitutes âcrime,â consent of a coerced sort to the idea that vicious loners are the worst criminals? There are other things that constitute murderous crime, things that do not trigger the same horrified fascination. There are killings carried out under the direction of men who wear suits and live in nice suburbs; killings done by men at computer terminals in nondescript facilities on the outskirts of American towns, and by women too; killings done at vast scale in the name of an economic system. Murder is not limited to merciless human hands on vulnerable human necks. Sometimes it is sufficient to have only the movement of money, the click of a button, the evocation of the legal right to preemptive violence. As for âthe most prolific serial killerâ: what would that even mean in a country built on genocide?