Companies are usually founded with a clear, vibrant sense of purpose. Yet, as companies mature, they often disintegrate into squabbling factions. Institutional self-enhancement and turf wars smother the spark and spirit of the early sense of purpose.

If you’re a company of one, your mind-set is to build your business around your life, not the other way around. For me, being a company of one means not having to bother with infinite growth, since that was never the purpose of my working. Instead, I just focus on maximizing work in a way that works for me, which can sometimes mean doing less.

For Penrose, the firm was defined not by the assets it owned or the contracts it made but by its capabilities and its ability to deploy those capabilities in productive services: ‘All the evidence we have indicates that the growth of firms is connected with the attempts of a particular group of people to do something.’ Perhaps that seems obvious. But her emphasis

on ‘the group’ recognises the centrally cooperative nature of business activity, and her identification of purpose – ‘to do something’ – establishes its problem-related focus.

I believe it is appropriate – indeed necessary – to view the business organisation in the same way. The proper goal of corporate activity is the flourishing of the multiple stakeholders of the corporation: employees, investors, suppliers and customers, the communities in which it operates and the corporation itself. For the corporation to flourish, it must contribute to the flourishing of the society in which it operates. And ‘the doctrine of the mean’ is as relevant to the business organisation as it is to the individual. The directors and executives of a flourishing company operate within a mediating hierarchy, which meets the needs of all its stakeholders, gives them an opportunity for voice and protects the business from the adverse consequences of stakeholder exit.

This can be particularly disorienting if you thought success would make you eternally happy or fill your life with meaning, only to discover that it does neither. Achieving success or accomplishing a huge goal (whether personal or public) does not answer the question of what to make of a life. In fact, it can have the exact opposite effect, forcing the question back to the center of your existence, to be addressed anew.

In my previous research into the question of what makes great companies tick, my colleagues and I observed a prevalent precursor to corporate decline: the post-BHAG stall. BHAG (pronounced “bee-hag”) stands for “Big Hairy Arduous Goal.” In Built to Last, Jerry Porras and I discovered the power of having a BHAG to galvanize an organization, acting as a powerful mechanism to stimulate progress. But we also discovered that companies can become adrift and on the verge of decline after achieving the BHAG. To avoid this trap, a company needs to have an enduring reason for being (its core purpose) that acts like a star on the horizon, forever chased but never reached no matter how many goals the company achieves.