Viewing technology as people also helps us understand why economic relations between the United States and China have broken down.
Related Quotes
Iāve come to realize that there are many way that China and the United States are inversions of each other. Households save a great deal of their earnings in China, while it is really easy to borrow money or spend on credit in America. In terms of national policy, China is much more focused on the supply side of the economy: It suppresses consumption as it favours manufacturers with preferential financing and all manner of policy support. The United States, meanwhile, is focused on regulating demand, for example, by imposing rent control in expensive cities or mailing out checks to consumers during the pandemic.
Itās hard, I admit, to draw a straight line between the loss of, for example, television manufacturing in the United States through the 1980s to the stumbles by Boeing and Intel over the past decade. But if we think about technology ecosystems as communities of engineering practice, it makes sense that factory closures accelerated as process knowledge dissolved, prompting production problems and more job losses. And it also makes sense that Chinese workers went from merely assembling iPhones to producing a some of their most valuable components as well.
I spent years covering the twists and turns of these technology restrictions. The more it went on, the more it felt that the United States was committed to a strategy of destroying its scientific and industrial establishmentā through prosecutions of scientists and cutting off the sales of chipmakersā in order to save it. Rather than realizing its own Sputnik moment, the United States triggered one in China.
Chinaās technology leaders have always bought American chips because they wanted to sell globally competitive products. They ignored Beijingās beseeching to buy from domestic vendors for the simple reason that Chinese technologies were not good enough.
Sometimes I think that the United Statesā tech competition with Chinaā chaotic policymaking under Trump, porous implementation under Bidenā has ended up in the worst of all worlds. These restrictions have scorched Chinaās most dynamic companies without killing them, which riles them up to break free of American restrictions.
As relations between the United States and China become more hostile, the chances of conflict grow. The United States is facing a peer competitor that has four times its population, an economy with considerable dynamic potential, and a manufacturing sector that can substantially counter produce itself and its allies. If China and the United States ever come to blows, they would be entering a conflagration with different strengths. Which would you rather have: software or hardware?