If left up to the editors, no new tool would ever be designed and no improvements would be possible. They saw no advantage to change and couldnât imagine how using a computer would make their work easier or better. But if we designed the new system in a vacuum, moving ahead without the editorsâ input, we would end up with a tool that didnât address their needs. Being confident about the value of our innovation was not enough. We needed buy-in from the community we were trying to serve. Without it, we were forced to abandon our plans.
Related Quotes
This concept, completely counter to what we believed and practiced at Pixar, could only result in an inferior product, so we made an announcement: From that day forward, there would be no more mandatory notes.
Disney Animationâs directors needed a feedback system that worked, so we immediately set about helping them create their own version of the Braintrust - a safe arena in which to solicit and interpret candid responses to developing projects. (This was made easier by the fact that they already liked and trusted each other. Even before our arrival, we were told, theyâd formed their own under-the-radar group called the Story Trust, but the lack of management understanding for that concept had prevented it from evolving into a coherent forum.)
Systematic sloughing off of the old is the one and only way to force the new. There is no lack of ideas in any organization I know. âCreativityâ is not our problem. But few organizations ever get going on their own good ideas. Everybody is much too busy on the tasks of yesterday. Putting all programs and activities regularly on trial for their lives and getting rid of those that cannot prove their productivity work wonders in stimulating creativity even in the most hidebound bureaucracy.
Systematic sloughing off of the old is the one and only way to force the new. There is no lack of ideas in any organization I know. âCreativityâ is not our problem. But few organizations ever get going on their own good ideas. Everybody is much too busy on the tasks of yesterday. Putting all programs and activities regularly on trial for their lives and getting rid of those that cannot prove their productivity work wonders in stimulating creativity even in the most hidebound bureaucracy.
Innovating without empathy rarely delivers the same kinds of results, particularly when it comes to customer-operators. Technology makes it possible to dramatically expand the customers operating role, but that doesn't necessarily translate into better numbers. Many banks learned this the hard way in the 1990s. As retail banks increased the number of low-cost channels for customers to use to serve themselves âvoice-recognition systems, ATMs, online banking â the institutions inadvertently undermined their margins. That's because customers didn't necessarily migrate to the lower-cost solutions. Instead, many simply increased their numbers of transactions overall, still coming to the teller window to deposit their weekly paychecks while also hitting the ATM and checking their balance online. In some cases, these high-tech tools enabled customers to engage their finances at a deeper level, which then increased their demand for traditional, high-cost banking services. Here's the irony: these banks were trying to save money with online tools, but instead, they designed a more costly model. Customers became much more expensive to serve, which wasn't sustainable. When your goal is service excellence, we suggest taking the opposite approach. Customer job design, especially self-service design, works best when you first work to increase the quality of the service experience, to make the service more convenient or customized (or whatever drives value in your business).
Innovating without empathy rarely delivers the same kinds of results, particularly when it comes to customer-operators. Technology makes it possible to dramatically expand the customers operating role, but that doesn't necessarily translate into better numbers. Many banks learned this the hard way in the 1990s. As retail banks increased the number of low-cost channels for customers to use to serve themselves âvoice-recognition systems, ATMs, online banking â the institutions inadvertently undermined their margins. That's because customers didn't necessarily migrate to the lower-cost solutions. Instead, many simply increased their numbers of transactions overall, still coming to the teller window to deposit their weekly paychecks while also hitting the ATM and checking their balance online. In some cases, these high-tech tools enabled customers to engage their finances at a deeper level, which then increased their demand for traditional, high-cost banking services. Here's the irony: these banks were trying to save money with online tools, but instead, they designed a more costly model. Customers became much more expensive to serve, which wasn't sustainable. When your goal is service excellence, we suggest taking the opposite approach. Customer job design, especially self-service design, works best when you first work to increase the quality of the service experience, to make the service more convenient or customized (or whatever drives value in your business).