Where-to-play choices occur across a number of domains, notably these:
⢠Geography. In what countries or regions will you seek to compete?
⢠Product type. What kinds of products and services will you offer?
⢠Consumer segment. What groups of consumers will you target? In which price tier?
Meeting which consumer needs?
⢠Distribution channel. How will you reach your customers? What channels will you use?
⢠Vertical stage of production. In what stages of production will you engage? Where along the value chain? How broadly or narrowly?
Related Quotes
The winning aspiration broadly defines the scope of the firmâs activities; where to play and how to win define the specific activities of the organizationâwhat the firm will do, and where and how it will do this, to achieve its aspirations. Where to play represents the set of choices that narrow the competitive field. The questions to be asked focus on where the company will competeâin which markets, with which customers and consumers, in which channels, in which product categories, and at which vertical stage or stages of the industry in question. This set of questions is vital; no company can be all things to all people and still win, so it is important to understand which where-to-play choices will best enable the company to win.
Where to play selects the playing field; how to win defines the choices for winning on that field. It is the recipe for success in the chosen segments, categories, channels, geographies, and so on. The how-to-win choice is intimately tied to the where-to-play choice. Remember, it is not how to win generally, but how to win within the chosen where- to-play domains.
Inevitably, the significance of each dimension of the where-to-play choice will vary by context. Each dimension must be considered thoughtfully and will hold different weight in different situations. A start-up might focus first on the products or services to be offered. A stagnating giant might focus on customersâlooking for a deeper understanding of needs
and new ways to approach segmentationâto narrow and refine an overly broad where-to-
play choice.
One final consideration for where to play is the competitive set. Just as it does when it defines winning aspirations, a company should make its where-to-play choices with the competition firmly in mind. Choosing a playing field identical to a strong competitorâs can be a less attractive proposition than tacking away to compete in a different way, for
different customers, or in different product lines. But strategy isnât simply a matter of finding a distinctive path. A company may choose to play in a crowded field or in one with a dominant competitor if the company can bring new and distinctive value. In such a case, winning may mean targeting the lead competitor right away or going after weaker competitors first.
The Heart of Strategy:
Where to play is about understanding the possible playing fields and choosing between them. It is about selecting regions, customers, products, channels, and stages of production that fit well togetherâthat are mutually reinforcing and that marry well with real consumer needs. Rather than attempt to serve everyone or simply buy a new playing field or accept your current choices as inevitable, find a strong set of where-to-play choices.â
(Lafley and Martin, âPlaying to Winâ, p.72) âWHERE-TO-PLAY DOS AND DONâTS:
⢠Do choose where you will play and where you will not play. Explicitly choose and prioritize choices across all relevant where dimensions (i.e., geographies, industry segments, consumers, customers, products, etc.).
⢠Do think long and hard before dismissing an entire industry as structurally unattractive; look for attractive segments in which you can compete and win.
⢠Donât embark on a strategy without specific where choices. If everything is a priority, nothing is. There is no point in trying to capture all segments. You canât. Donât try.
⢠Do look for places to play that will enable you to attack from unexpected directions, along the lines of least resistance. Donât attack walled cities or take on your strongest competitors head-to-head if you can help it.
⢠Donât start wars on multiple fronts at once. Plan for your competitorsâ reactions to your initial choices, and think multiple steps ahead. No single choice needs to last forever, but it should last long enough to confer the advantage you seek.
⢠Do be honest about the allure of white space. It is tempting to be the first mover into unoccupied white space. Unfortunately, there is only one true first mover (as there is only one low-cost player), and all too often, the imagined white space is already occupied by a formidable competitor you just donât see or understand.