As always, itâs smart to begin with the limiting pot of resources for which an organization is contesting. In this case, that pot is household spending on entertainment. Given that, the situation (who, what, where) might well evolve from predominantly the living room at home to anywhere people would like to consume content, especially in light of the advent of greater mobility and faster cellular service.
Related Quotes
Inevitably, the significance of each dimension of the where-to-play choice will vary by context. Each dimension must be considered thoughtfully and will hold different weight in different situations. A start-up might focus first on the products or services to be offered. A stagnating giant might focus on customersâlooking for a deeper understanding of needs
and new ways to approach segmentationâto narrow and refine an overly broad where-to-
play choice.
As current CEO Bob McDonald explains, âWe donât give lip service to consumer
understanding. We dig deep. We immerse ourselves in peopleâs day-to-day lives. We work hard to find the tensions that we can help resolve. From those tensions come insights that lead to big ideas.â Those big ideas can be the basis of a powerful where-to-play choice.
The Heart of Strategy:
Where to play is about understanding the possible playing fields and choosing between them. It is about selecting regions, customers, products, channels, and stages of production that fit well togetherâthat are mutually reinforcing and that marry well with real consumer needs. Rather than attempt to serve everyone or simply buy a new playing field or accept your current choices as inevitable, find a strong set of where-to-play choices.â
(Lafley and Martin, âPlaying to Winâ, p.72) âWHERE-TO-PLAY DOS AND DONâTS:
⢠Do choose where you will play and where you will not play. Explicitly choose and prioritize choices across all relevant where dimensions (i.e., geographies, industry segments, consumers, customers, products, etc.).
⢠Do think long and hard before dismissing an entire industry as structurally unattractive; look for attractive segments in which you can compete and win.
⢠Donât embark on a strategy without specific where choices. If everything is a priority, nothing is. There is no point in trying to capture all segments. You canât. Donât try.
⢠Do look for places to play that will enable you to attack from unexpected directions, along the lines of least resistance. Donât attack walled cities or take on your strongest competitors head-to-head if you can help it.
⢠Donât start wars on multiple fronts at once. Plan for your competitorsâ reactions to your initial choices, and think multiple steps ahead. No single choice needs to last forever, but it should last long enough to confer the advantage you seek.
⢠Do be honest about the allure of white space. It is tempting to be the first mover into unoccupied white space. Unfortunately, there is only one true first mover (as there is only one low-cost player), and all too often, the imagined white space is already occupied by a formidable competitor you just donât see or understand.
It is tempting to believe that strategy in general, and where-to-play and how-to-win choices in particular, are needed only for outward-facing functionsâthose folks who interact with external consumers and competitors. But every line of business and function
should have a strategyâone that aligns with the strategy of the company overall and decides where to play and how to win specifically for its context. At P&G, corporate functions are all tasked with crafting their own strategies in this way. Joan Lewis, global consumer market knowledge officer, explains: âWhere to play and how to win has been a very important framework for us. Organizations are often good at one or the other without realizing that theyâre two different sets of decisions. At one point, we werenât as disciplined about our where-to-play choices. It was everywhere anybody needed consumer insight or anywhere we thought it could add value. Just like a business dilutes its focus and in turn its growth potential when you try to do too many things at a time or do things that are further away from your core strengths, we were relatively diluted in the nature of the impact we could have.
Netflix has very deliberately not defined its arena in terms of traditional television. Instead, it has framed its challenge in terms of increasing the percentage of their leisure time its members spend on the service. As their investor messaging says:
We compete with all the activities that consumers have at their disposal in their leisure time. This includes watching content on other streaming services, linear TV, DVD or TVOD but also reading a book, surfing YouTube, playing video games, socializing on Facebook, going out to dinner with friends or enjoying a glass of wine with their partner, just to name a few. We earn a tiny fraction of consumersâ time and money, and have lots of opportunity to win more share of leisure time, if we can keep improving.