If youâve got a list of twelve options, cross out seven, then rewrite your list with just the remaining five on it, and go to step three. Most of our students and clients freak out at this idea.
âYou canât just cross options off!â
âWhat if I cross out the wrong one?â
We understand. But weâre not kiddingâyou just cross them off. Remember, if youâve got too many options, you really donât have any, so youâve got nothing to lose. And you wonât cross off the wrong one. We call this the Pizza-Chinese Effect. Weâve all experienced it. Ed sticks his head in your office and says, âHey, Paulaâweâre going out for lunch. Wanna come?â
âSure!â
âWeâre choosing between pizza and Chinese foodâgot a preference?â
âNahâwhateverâs good!â
âOkayâweâre getting pizza.â
âNo, wait. I want Chinese!â
In that situation, when you gave your first answer (âwhateverâs goodâ), you thought you meant it. You didnât know that you had a preference until an unwanted decision occurred as a fait accompli.
Related Quotes
What does this research tell us? First, that we love having options (âWhoa! Twenty-four jams?! Letâs check this out!!â), and, second, that we canât deal with too many of them (âUm...so many...canât decide; letâs go get some cheeseâ). In fact, most minds can choose effectively between only three to five options. If weâre faced with more than that, our ability to make a choice begins to waneâmany more than that and our ability to choose completely freezes. Itâs just the way our brains are wired. Weâre attracted to having alternatives, and our modern culture almost idolizes options for their own sake. Get lots of options! Keep your options open! Donât get locked in! We hear this sort of thinking all the time, and it seems to make sense, but there absolutely can be too much of this good option thing. When you toss in the Internet and the fact that we can now be made aware of seemingly every idea and activity on the planet after a subsecond Google search, most of us are suffering a pandemic attack of too many options.
The key is to reframe your idea of options by realizing that if you have too many options, you actually have none at all. If you get frozen in front of your daunting list of possibilities, then, in fact, you have no options. Remember that options only actually create value in your life when they are chosen and realized. We often teach our students that when an option grows up it becomes a choice. So, when youâve got twenty-four jam options, you actually have zero options. Once you understand that, in choice making, twenty-four equals zero (and, boy, is it hard to believe when you love your options and worked so hard to find and come up with them), then you are free to take the next step: narrowing down.
Dan Gilbert at Harvard has looked at this area and demonstrated the effect letting go of your options has, in a study evaluating how people made decisions about different Monet art prints. He asked people to rank five different Monet prints according to their preference, numbering them from one to five. Whichever prints the subjects ranked numbers three and four he said the experimenters happened to have spare copies of and were letting subjects take one home with them. Of course, most of the people took the one they had ranked number three. Then, interestingly, the experimenters told some of the people that they could swap the one they took for the other one later if they wanted to, and the other people were told that whatever print they took home was itâno swapping.
After a few weeks, the experimenters checked back with the subjects. The people who had been told they could swap their printsâeven though they had not done soâwere less happy with their choices than the people who had chosen the exact same prints but had been told the choice was irreversible. It turns out that reversibility is not conducive to establishing reliable happiness with a decision. Apparently, just the invitation to reconsider and âkeep your options openâ makes us doubt and devalue our choice.
Do yourself the favor of getting lots of options, then culling the list down to a short and manageable size (five max); then make the best choice that you can, given the time and resources available to you, get on with it, and build your way forward. Note that if youâre doing this with prototype iteration, you donât have too much at stake, and you will be able to adjust as you go, before you really reach a significant investment. And once you make a choiceâthen embrace your choice and go with it. When the questions that lead to agonizing creep into your head, evict the thoughts, and direct your energy into living well the decisions youâve made. Pay attention and learn as you go, of course, but donât get caught with your eyes fixated on the rearview mirror of decision regret.
This letting-go step relies primarily on personal discipline. Keep your reframed understanding of decision making handy, and be sure to win the internal argument with yourself when youâre tempted to rehash and ruminate. Put in place the support you need to stick with itâfind a life design collaborator or team to help remind you why you made the choice or choices you did; make a journal entry about your decision, and reread it when you get confused. Find what works to enable yourself to enjoy your choices fully.
One of the most common mistakes people make is bargaining with how the world should work instead of accepting how it does work. Anytime you find yourself or your colleague complaining âthatâs not right,â or âthatâs not fair,â or âit shouldnât be that way,â you are bargaining, not accepting. You want the world to work in a way that it doesnât.
Failing to accept how the world really works puts your time and energy toward proving how right you are. When the desired results donât materialize, itâs easy to blame circumstances or others. I call this the wrong side of right. Youâre focused on your ego not the outcome.
Solutions appear when you stop bargaining and start accepting the reality of the situation. Thatâs because focusing on the next move, rather than how you got here in the first place, opens you up to a lot of possibilities. When you put outcome over ego, you get better results.
There are two safeguards against binary thinking. The first is this:
Safeguard: Imagine that one of the options is off the table. Take each of the options youâre considering, and one at a time, ask yourself, âWhat would I do if that were not possible?â
Suppose youâre considering what to do about a job where you donât get along with a coworker. Binary thinking tells you to stay or leave. Imagining one option is off the table forces you to see the problem differently. Imagine that, for some reason, there is absolutely no way to quit your job: You must stay. Now you are forced to see things through a new lens. What could you do to make going to work every day more enjoyable, despite the problem with your coworker? What could you do to remain at your job and still move closer to your goals? What could you do to give yourself more options in the future so youâre not stuck feeling powerless? Maybe staying means having a hard conversation with your boss and your coworker that you havenât had yet. Maybe it means putting in for a transfer to another department. Maybe it means asking your boss if you can work remotely.