Dr. Charles Garfield has done extensive research on peak performers, both in athletics and in business. He became fascinated with peak performance in his work with the NASA program, watching the astronauts rehearse everything on earth, again and again in a simulated environment before they went to space. Although he had a doctorate in mathematics, he decided to go back and get another Ph.D. in the field of psychology and study the characteristics of peak performers.
Related Quotes
... the research into high performance in any profession or endeavor reveals that excellence is idiosyncratic. The well-rounded high performer is a creature of theory world. In the real world each high performer is unique and distinct, and excels precisely because that person has understood his or her uniqueness and cultivated it intelligently.
The researchers had measured ten dimensions for each pilot, so now Daniels set himself the task of going through the data, pilot by pilot by pilot, and counting how many of the 4,063 pilots were in the middle 30 percent on all of the ten dimensions.
The answer, when it came, was this: none. There were no average-sized pilotsânone whatsoever. Even if you looked at just three of the ten dimensions, fewer than 5 percent of the pilots were average-sized on all three. Even in a population of humans deliberately selected against a set of criteria (if you were too tall or too short, for instance, you werenât qualified to become a USAF pilot in the first place), there was no one-size-fits-all, not even close.
Just as Don Clifton discovered that the only predictor of performance was total score across a number of relevant variablesâthat there was no right pattern of abilities, only a right sum of abilitiesâGilbert Daniels discovered that there were no average humans in a population of 4,063, and that the average is a mathematical concept, not something that exists in the physical world. While the outcomes of high performance are visible and clear, the ingredients of high performance vary from person to person. There is no one-size-fits-all when it comes to human beings; and 8 9 there is no one-size-fits-all when it comes to great performance.
Not surprisingly, when Google conducted a study to determine the factors behind high-performing teams, psychological safety came out at the top of the list. (More details about the study can be found in James Graham, âWhat Google Learned from Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team,â New York Times, February 25, 2016.)
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People - Stephen R. Covey
PART ONE: Paradigms and Principles
Inside-Out
âIn stark contrast, almost all the literature in the first 150 years or so focused on what could be called the Character Ethic as the foundation of successâthings like integrity, humility, fidelity, temperance, courage, justice, patience, industry, simplicity, modesty, and the Golden Rule. Benjamin Franklinâs autobiography is representative of that literature. It is, basically, the story of one manâs effort to integrate certain principles and habits deep within his nature.
The Character Ethic taught that there are basic principles of effective living, and that people can only experience true success and enduring happiness as they learn and integrate these principles into their basic character. But shortly after World War I the basic view of success shifted from the Character Ethic to what we might call the Personality Ethic. Success became more a function of personality, of public image, of attitudes and behaviors, skills and techniques, that lubricate the processes of human interaction. This Personality Ethic essentially took two paths: one was human and public relations techniques, and the other was positive mental attitude (PMA). Some of this philosophy was expressed in inspiring and sometimes valid maxims such as âYour attitude determines your altitude,â âSmiling wins more friends than frowning,â and âWhatever the mind of man can conceive and believe it can achieve.â
Other parts of the personality approach were clearly manipulative, even deceptive, encouraging people to use techniques to get other people to like them, or to fake interest in the hobbies of others to get out of them what they wanted, or to use the âpower look,â or to intimidate their way through life.
Some of this literature acknowledged character as an ingredient of success, but tended to compartmentalize it rather than recognize it as foundational and catalytic. Reference to the Character Ethic became mostly lip service; the basic thrust was quick-fix influence techniques, power strategies, communication skills, and positive attitudes.
(Covey, âThe 7 Habits of Highly Effective Peopleâ, p.168)