← Back

In Improbable Scholars, David Kirp offers an example of how effective this approach can be, even when scaled up to an entire school district. His focus is on low-income Union City, New Jersey, schools where students score as well as their much better-off suburban counterparts in writing, reading, and math. No silver bullets. No off-the shelf reform package. Rather, it’s stable leadership and day-to-day, year-in, year-out commitment to doing all the big and little things that put expert-tutor wiseness into students’ daily lives: child-centered over staff-centered priorities, big investments in preschool, rigorous and integrated curricula, explicit and constant attention to building cultures of respect and confidence in students’ potential. The academic mission of these schools is unconditional. But they understand that when a focus on building trust is persistently applied— in curriculum decisions, disciplinary policies, rules for composing student study groups, after-school options, the examples used in presenting STEM material, the hiring of teachers and staff— it can take a school to a tipping point of effectiveness for all students.

This is how good schools— like good restaurants, as my colleague Joshua Aronson pointed out to me— get built. Guiding principles are minutely and persistently applied. We keep track of how they work, and we refine them to better and better effect. It is the ground game of school improvement.