The stories weâre reading here are among the best their authors ever wrote. But these authors also wrote lesser ones, and itâs important to read those too, if only to remind ourselves that nobody hits it out of the park every time, and that a masterpiece might have three or four test runs behind it, in which the artist was working some things out.
Related Quotes
Again, Chekhovâs instinct seems to be toward variation, against stasis. One of his gifts is an ability to naturally impose variety on a situation that a lesser writer would leave static.
When a writer subjects us to a non-normative eventâa physical implausibility, the use of markedly elevated language (or markedly vernacular language), or a series of lengthy digressions in a Russian pub in which the people keep freezing in midaction for several pages so that each can be described at length, in turnâhe pays a price: our reading energy drops. (We get suspicious and resistant.) But if it doesnât drop fatally, and if, later, we see that this was all part of the planâif what seemed a failure of craft turns out to be integral to the storyâs meaning (that is, it seems that he âmeant to do thatâ)âthen all is forgiven and we might even understand the profitable exploitation of that apparent excess as a form of virtuosity.
This is a big moment for any artist (this moment of combined triumph and disappointment), when we have to decide whether to accept a work of art that we have to admit we werenât in control of as we made it and of which weâre not entirely sure we approve. It is less, less than we wanted it to be, and yet itâs more, tooâitâs small and a bit pathetic, judged against the work of the great masters, but there it is, all ours.
The boldness of this leap teaches us something important about the short story: it is not a documentary or rigorous accounting of the passage of time or a fair-minded attempt to show life as it is really lived; itâs a radically shaped, even somewhat cartoonish (when held up against the tedious real world) little machine that thrills us with the extremity of its decisiveness.
We might imagine a story as a room-sized black box. The writerâs goal is to have the reader go into that box in one state of mind and come out in another. What happens in there has to be thrilling and non-trivial.
Thatâs it.
What is the exact avor of the thrill? The writer doesnât have to know. Thatâs what heâs writing to find out.