The choice is not between hands-on or hands-off. In our research, the entrepreneurs who led their companies from start-ups into some of the greatest corporations in history generally had both a hands-on style and an empowering style. No matter how big their companies became, they remained closely connected to their people, hyper-aware of facts on the ground, and directly engaged in strategic imperatives. If you lose your voracious curiosity about tactical details, if you lose passionate interest in people and how they are feeling, if you insulate yourself in the protective cocoon of executive comforts, you may well wake up one day to discover your company has already entered a doom loop of decline and self-destruction.
Related Quotes
To the extent that you feel you fall into that category â a rare genius who has perfect pitch in terms of what the market wants â you may be able to specify the work that needs to be done clearly enough for others to merely execute. In that case, go for it! You will be able to forfeit seeking or listening to the input of those who work below you in the organization. Henry Ford, after all, was said to have complained, âwhy is it every time I ask for a pair of hands, they come with a brain attached?â But for the rest of us, I wouldn't recommend that approach. Few business leaders today can afford to squander the brainpower available in their companies. At the very least most of us need an honest sounding board. But better yet, we need people to bring their ideas to work to help us create better products and a better organization.
Iâve seen way too many people come out of the corporate world, decide to start a company, and be completely unprepared for what it takes. If theyâve never been on a small team starting from scratch, theyâre often a fish out of water. They spend too much money too fast. Hire too many people. Donât put in the time, donât have the startup mentality, canât make hard decisions, are buried by consensus thinking. They end up making mediocre products or
nothing at all.
Donât let that be your story. If you want to start a company, if you want to start anything, to create something new, then you need to be ready to push for greatness. And greatness doesnât come from nothing. You have to prepare. You have to know where youâre headed and remember where you came from. You have to make hard decisions and be the mission-driven âasshole.â [See also: Chapter 2.3: Assholes: Mission-driven âassholes.â]
So do the work. Know what youâre getting into. Trust your gut.
And when the time comes, youâll be ready.
My goal was to make employees feel like owners and, in turn, to increase the amount of responsibility they took for the companyâs success. However, opening company secrets to employees had another outcome: it made our workforce smarter. When you give low-level employees access to information that is generally reserved for high-level executives, they get more done on their own. They work faster without stopping to ask for information and approval. They make better decisions without needing input from the top.
In most businesses, without even realizing it, senior managers stunt the abilities and intelligence of their own workforce by keeping financial and strategic information hidden. Although just about all companies talk about empowering staff, in the vast majority of organizations, real empowerment is a pipe dream because employees arenât given enough information to take ownership of anything.
People desire and thrive on jobs that give them control over their own decisions. Since the 1980s, management literature has been filled with instructions for how to delegate more and âempower employees to empower themselves.â The thinking is exactly what weâve heard from Paolo. The more people are given control over their own projects, the more ownership they feel, and the more motivated they are to do their best work. Telling employees what to do is so old-fashioned, it leads to screams of âmicromanager!â âdictator!â and âautocrat!
The decision to disrupt businesses that are fundamentally working but whose future is in questionâintentionally taking on short-term losses in the hope of generating long-term growthârequires no small amount of courage. Routines and priorities get disrupted, jobs change, responsibility is reallocated. People can easily become unsettled as their traditional way of doing business begins to erode and a new model emerges. Itâs a lot to manage, from a personnel perspective, and the need to be present for your peopleâwhich is a vital leadership quality under any circumstancesâis heightened even more. Itâs easy for leaders to send a signal that their schedules are too full, their time too valuable, to be dealing with individual problems and concerns. But being present for your peopleâand making sure they know that youâre available to themâis so important for the morale and effectiveness of a company.