People desire and thrive on jobs that give them control over their own decisions. Since the 1980s, management literature has been filled with instructions for how to delegate more and âempower employees to empower themselves.â The thinking is exactly what weâve heard from Paolo. The more people are given control over their own projects, the more ownership they feel, and the more motivated they are to do their best work. Telling employees what to do is so old-fashioned, it leads to screams of âmicromanager!â âdictator!â and âautocrat!
Related Quotes
The choice is not between hands-on or hands-off. In our research, the entrepreneurs who led their companies from start-ups into some of the greatest corporations in history generally had both a hands-on style and an empowering style. No matter how big their companies became, they remained closely connected to their people, hyper-aware of facts on the ground, and directly engaged in strategic imperatives. If you lose your voracious curiosity about tactical details, if you lose passionate interest in people and how they are feeling, if you insulate yourself in the protective cocoon of executive comforts, you may well wake up one day to discover your company has already entered a doom loop of decline and self-destruction.
People need freedom to act. Motivated, trained, and well-inculturated people donât need to be âcontrolled.â Adults donât need to be treated like children. People tend not to do their best work with someone looking over their shoulders.
Do people in your companyâall peopleâhave the authority (i.e., without approval from anyone) to make decisions that cost money? They ought to. Whoa! We bet that got your attention. Are we serious?
Yes. Weâre very serious. Of course, we donât mean that all people should have the authority to commit the company to million-dollar contracts, or that front-line clerks should be able to authorize the purchase of a new building. But people should have wide discretionary power to take responsibility to make sure something gets done fast, and done right.
How is it that in their personal lives, employees can be trusted to buy houses and cars, but at work canât requisition a $300 office chair without a managerâs approval? If we thought about it for a minute, weâd realize this is stupid. Autonomy correlates with initiative and innovation. Shrink an individualâs freedom and you shrink their enthusiasm and creativity.
Once you have a workforce made up nearly exclusively of high performers, you can count on people to behave responsibly. Once you have developed a culture of candor, employees will watch out for one another and ensure their teammatesâ actions are in line with the good of the company. Then you can begin to remove controls and give your staff more freedom. Great places to start are the lifting of your vacation, travel, and expense policies. These elements give people more control over their own lives and convey a loud message that you trust your employees to do whatâs right. The trust you offer will in turn instill feelings of responsibility in your workforce, leading everyone in the company to have a greater sense of ownership.
My goal was to make employees feel like owners and, in turn, to increase the amount of responsibility they took for the companyâs success. However, opening company secrets to employees had another outcome: it made our workforce smarter. When you give low-level employees access to information that is generally reserved for high-level executives, they get more done on their own. They work faster without stopping to ask for information and approval. They make better decisions without needing input from the top.
In most businesses, without even realizing it, senior managers stunt the abilities and intelligence of their own workforce by keeping financial and strategic information hidden. Although just about all companies talk about empowering staff, in the vast majority of organizations, real empowerment is a pipe dream because employees arenât given enough information to take ownership of anything.