In a bureaucracy, human beings are instruments, employed by an organization to create products and services. In a humanocracy, the organization is the instrument—it’s the vehicle human beings use to better their lives and the lives of those they serve. (See figure 1-2.) The question at the core of bureaucracy is, “How do we get human beings to better serve the organization?” The question at the heart of humanocracy is, “What sort of organization elicits and merits the best that human beings can give?” As we’ll see, the implications of this shift in perspective are profound.

Third, like nuclear power plants and space rockets, bureaucracies are complex, integrated systems. Every process is connected to every other process. This lack of modularity makes it difficult to change one thing without changing everything. Where do you start? That’s the paradox of change in a bureaucracy: what seems doable isn’t transformational and what’s transformational doesn’t seem doable. The result: an endless succession of tweaks that never succeed in making the organization fundamentally more capable.

Let us not pretend, though, that bureaucracy advances independent of human intention. The fuel that feeds the growth of bureaucracy is the quest for personal power. Power brings survival advantages, and we are wired to seek it. Having the power to direct your life is essential, but like the desire for food, alcohol, or sex, the lust for power can enslave us. That’s why philosophers and moral teachers so often warn us of its dangers.

Formal power is the currency of bureaucracy; it is the prize for which the game is played. Bureaucracy inflames our natural desire for power, sometimes to the point of caricature. As a result, bureaucracy often brings out the worst in people, whether it’s a minor functionary gleefully enforcing a petty rule, or a CEO getting an ego massage from a deferential underling. In other words, bureaucracy isn’t simply an organizational problem—it’s a human problem.

Before moving on, let’s recap:

• Bureaucracies are replication machines. They’re designed for exploit, not explore.

• Bureaucracies tend to be monocultures. They’re run by individuals temperamentally inclined to favor the status quo.

• Bureaucratic information systems fail to capture the hidden costs of one-sided trade-offs. As a result, many decisions are underinformed and, therefore, suboptimal.

• Bureaucracies tend to enforce uniform trade-offs across the entire organization. Though unsophisticated, this preserves the center’s power and sense of order.

• The bureaucratic aversion to ambiguity leads to either/or thinking. Rather than maintaining a creative tension, organizations tend to whipsaw between counterposed priorities.