But the experience showed me that creativity was going to be the main ingredient in striking a true balance between restaurant-smart and corporate-smart.
Related Quotes
When you create a hospitality-first culture, everything about your business improvesâwhether that means finding and retaining great talent, turning customers into raving fans, or increasing your profitability.
The cornerstone of the companyâs culture was a philosophy Danny called Enlightened Hospitality, which upended traditional hierarchies by prioritizing the people who worked there over everything else, including the guests and the investors. This didnât mean the customer suffered; in fact, the opposite. Dannyâs big idea was to hire great people, treat them well, and invest deeply into their personal and professional growth, and they would take great care of the customersâwhich is exactly what they did.
In a restaurant-smart company, that phone call most likely would never have happened. And if the controller did happen to catch the mistake (if the company had a controller at all!) and reached out to the chef, theyâd likely be told to stay in their lane. But overhearing that phone call taught me that someone in corporate wielding that kind of control isnât always unwelcome. The chefâs bonus was tied to his food costs, and if his numbers were consistently below par, heâd be out of a job. That explained the relief Iâd heard in his voice when Hani told him where heâd been bleeding. Our back-office efficiency meant that guy didnât have to worry about the numbers and could go back to being a chef. We werenât stealing his creativity; we were returning him to it.
The museum cafĂ©s, meanwhile, were the redheaded stepchildren of USHG, and I loved it. We were flying under the radar and had lots of creative freedom as a result. I immediately set out to implement my vision: to make the cafĂ©s at MoMA corporate-smart and restaurant-smart. But what I discovered almost immediately is that walking that line is really, really hard. Every decision I made seemed to expose the natural tensions between improving the quality of the experience the guests were having and doing what was best for the business. Restaurant-smart meant leading with trustâincluding allowing the people who worked for me to do what they felt was best for the guests. Corporate-smart meant running a tight ship. Which was right?
I had a different point of view. I wanted our team members to understand that hospitality elevates service not only for the person receiving it, but for the person delivering it.