Murakami
No matter how mundane some action might appear, keep at it long enough and it becomes a contemplative, even meditative act. As a writer, then, and as a runner, I donāt find that writing and publishing a book of my own personal thoughts about running makes me stray too far off my usual path. Perhaps Iām just too painstaking a type of person, but I canāt grasp much of anything without putting down my thoughts in writing, so I had to actually get my hands working and write these words. Otherwise, Iād never know what running means to me.
Though I wouldnāt call any of this philosophy per se, this book does contain a certain amount of what might be dubbed life lessons. They might not amount to much, but they are personal lessons Iāve learned through actually putting my own body in motion, and thereby discovering that suffering is optional.
Right now Iām aiming at increasing the distance I run, so speed is less of an issue. As long as I can run a certain distance, thatās all I care about. Sometimes I run fast when I feel like it, but if I increase the pace I shorten the amount of time I run, the point being to let the exhilaration I feel at the end of each run carry over to the next day. This is the same sort of tack I find necessary when writing a novel. I stop every day right at the point where I feel I can write more. Do that, and the next dayās work goes surprisingly smoothly. I think Ernest Hemingway did something like that. To keep on going, you have to keep up the rhythm. This is the important thing for long-term projects. Once you set the pace, the rest will follow. The problem is getting the flywheel to spin at a set speedāand to get to that point takes as much concentration and effort as you can manage.
Commonplace they might be, but the accumulation of these memories has led to one result: me.
The same can be said about my profession. In the novelistās profession, as far as Iām concerned, thereās no such thing as winning or losing. Maybe numbers of copies sold, awards won, and criticsā praise serve as outward standards for accomplishment in literature, but none of them really matter. Whatās crucial is whether your writing attains the standards youāve set for yourself. Failure to reach that bar is not something you can easily explain away. When it comes to other people, you can always come up with a reasonable explanation, but you canāt fool yourself. In this sense, writing novels and running full marathons are very much alike. Basically a writer has a quiet, inner motivation, and doesnāt seek validation in the outwardly visible.
It might be a little silly for someone getting to be my age to put this into words, but I just want to make sure I get the facts down clearly: Iām the kind of person who likes to be by himself. To put a finer point on it, Iām the type of person who doesnāt find it painful to be alone. I find spending an hour or two every day running alone, not speaking to anyone, as well as four or five hours alone at my desk, to be neither difficult nor boring. Iāve had this tendency ever since I was young, when, given a choice, I much preferred reading books on my own or concentrating on listening to music over being with someone else. I could always think of things to do by myself.
I just run. I run in a void. Or maybe I should put it the other way: I run in order to acquire a void. But as you might expect, an occasional thought will slip into this void. Peopleās minds canāt be a complete blank. Human beingsā emotions are not strong or consistent enough to sustain a vacuum. What I mean is, the kinds of thoughts and ideas that invade my emotions as I run remain subordinate to that void. Lacking content, they are just random thoughts that gather around that central void.
And now here I am living in this unimaginable world. It feels really strange, and I canāt tell if Iām fortunate or not. Maybe it doesnāt matter. For meāand for everybody else, probablyāthis is my first experience growing old, and the emotions Iām having, too, are all first-time feelings. If it were something Iād experienced before, then Iād be able to understand it more clearly, but this is the first time, so I canāt. For now all I can do is put off making any detailed judgments and accept things as they are. Just like I accept the sky, the clouds, and the river. And thereās also something kind of comical about it all, something you donāt want to discard completely.
As I mentioned before, competing against other people, whether in daily life or in my field of work, is just not the sort of lifestyle Iām after. Forgive me for stating the obvious, but the world is made up of all kinds of people. Other people have their own values to live by, and the same holds true with me. These differences give rise to disagreements, and the combination of these disagreements can give rise to even greater misunderstandings.
And because of this we have the extraordinary situation in which quite a few people read what Iāve written. So the fact that Iām me and no one else is one of my greatest assets. Emotional hurt is the price a person has to pay in order to be independent.
I just figured, though, that since failure was not an option, Iād have to give it everything I had. My only strength has always been the fact that I work hard and can take a lot physically. Iām more a workhorse than a racehorse.
Gradually, though, I found myself wanting to write a more substantial kind of novel. With the first two, Hear the Wind Sing and Pinball, 1973, I basically enjoyed the process of writing, but there were parts I wasnāt too pleased with. With these first two novels I was only able to write in spurts, snatching bits of time here and thereāa half hour here, an hour thereāand because I was always tired and felt like I was competing against the clock as I wrote, I was never able to concentrate. With this kind of scattered approach I was able to write some interesting, fresh things, but the result was far from a complex or profound novel. I felt Iād been given a wonderful opportunity to be a novelistāa chance you just donāt get every dayāand a natural desire sprang up to take it as far as I possibly could and write the kind of novel Iād feel satisfied with. I knew I could write something more large-scale. And after giving it a lot of thought, I decided to close the business for a while and concentrate solely on writing. At this point my income from the jazz club was more than my income as a novelist, a reality I had to resign myself to.
When I finished the novel I had a good feeling that Iād created my own writing style. My whole body thrilled at the thought of how wonderfulāand how difficultāit is to be able to sit at my desk, not worrying about time, and concentrate on writing. There were untouched veins still dormant within me, I felt, and now I could actually picture myself making a living as a novelist. So in the end the fallback idea of opening a small bar again never materialized. Sometimes, though, even now, I think how nice it would be to run a little bar somewhere.
Iām struck by how, except when youāre young, you really need to prioritize in life, figuring out in what order you should divide up your time and energy. If you donāt get that sort of system set by a certain age, youāll lack focus and your life will be out of balance. I placed the highest priority on the sort of life that lets me focus on writing, not associating with all the people around me. I felt that the indispensable relationship I should build in my life was not with a specific person, but with an unspecified number of readers. As long as I got my day-to-day life set so that each work was an improvement over the last, then many of my readers would welcome whatever life I chose for myself. Shouldnāt this be my duty as a novelist, and my top priority? My opinion hasnāt changed over the years. I canāt see my readersā faces, so in a sense itās a conceptual type of human relationship, but Iāve consistently considered this invisible, conceptual relationship to be the most important thing in my life.
Even when I ran my bar I followed the same policy. A lot of customers came to the bar. If one out of ten enjoyed the place and said heād come again, that was enough. If one out of ten was a repeat customer, then the business would survive. To put it the other way, it didnāt matter if nine out of ten didnāt like my bar. This realization lifted a weight off my shoulders.
I went on writing the kind of things I wanted to write, exactly the way I wanted to write them, and if that allowed me to make a normal living, then I couldnāt ask for more. When Norwegian Wood sold way more than anticipated, the comfortable position I had was forced to change a bit, but this was quite a bit later.
Writers who are blessed with inborn talent can freely write novels no matter what they doāor donāt do. Like water from a natural spring, the sentences just well up, and with little or no effort these writers can complete a work. Occasionally youāll find someone like that, but, unfortunately, that category wouldnāt include me. I havenāt spotted any springs nearby. I have to pound the rock with a chisel and dig out a deep hole before I can locate the source of creativity. To write a novel I have to drive myself hard physically and use a lot of time and effort. Every time I begin a new novel, I have to dredge out another new, deep hole. But as Iāve sustained this kind of life over many years, Iāve become quite efficient, both technically and physically, at opening a hole in the hard rock and locating a new water vein. So as soon as I notice one water source drying up, I can move on right away to another. If people who rely on a natural spring of talent suddenly find theyāve exhausted their only source, theyāre in trouble.
In other words, letās face it: Life is basically unfair. But even in a situation thatās unfair, I think itās possible to seek out a kind of fairness. Of course, that might take time and effort. And maybe it wonāt seem to be worth all that. Itās up to each individual to decide whether or not it is.
But I donāt think itās merely willpower that makes you able to do something. The world isnāt that simple. To tell the truth, I donāt even think thereās that much correlation between my running every day and whether or not I have a strong will. I think Iāve been able to run for more than twenty years for a simple reason: It suits me. Or at least because I donāt find it all that painful. Human beings naturally continue doing things they like, and they donāt continue what they donāt like. Admittedly, something close to will does play a small part in that. But no matter how strong a will a person has, no matter how much he may hate to lose, if itās an activity he doesnāt really care for, he wonāt keep it up for long. Even if he did, it wouldnāt be good for him.
I always want to advise teachers not to force all junior and senior high school students to run the same course, but I doubt anybodyās going to listen to me. Thatās what schools are like. The most important thing we ever learn at school is the fact that the most important things canāt be learned at school.
At any rate, thatās how I started running. Thirty-threeāthatās how old I was then. Still young enough, though no longer a young man. The age that Jesus Christ died. The age that Scott Fitzgerald started to go downhill. That age may be a kind of crossroads in life. That was the age when I began my life as a runner, and it was my belated, but real, starting point as a novelist.
Itās pretty thin, the wall separating healthy confidence and unhealthy pride.
Nothing in the real world is as beautiful as the illusions of a person about to lose consciousness.
Muscles really are like animals, and they want to take it as easy as possible; if pressure isnāt applied to them, they relax and cancel out the memory of all that work. Input this canceled memory once again, and you have to repeat the whole journey from the very beginning.
In every interview Iām asked whatās the most important quality a novelist has to have. Itās pretty obvious: talent. No matter how much enthusiasm and effort you put into writing, if you totally lack literary talent you can forget about being a novelist. This is more of a prerequisite than a necessary quality. If you donāt have any fuel, even the best car wonāt run.
If Iām asked what the next most important quality is for a novelist, thatās easy too: focusāthe ability to concentrate all your limited talents on whateverās critical at the moment. Without that you canāt accomplish anything of value, while, if you can focus effectively, youāll be able to compensate for an erratic talent or even a shortage of it.
After focus, the next most important thing for a novelist is, hands down, endurance. If you concentrate on writing three or four hours a day and feel tired after a week of this, youāre not going to be able to write a long work. Whatās needed for a writer of fictionāat least one who hopes to write a novelāis the energy to focus every day for half a year, or a year, two years.
Patience is a must in this process, but I guarantee the results will come.
But once you try your hand at it, you soon find that it isnāt as peaceful a job as it seems. The whole processāsitting at your desk, focusing your mind like a laser beam, imagining something out of a blank horizon, creating a story, selecting the right words, one by one, keeping the whole flow of the story on trackārequires far more energy, over a long period, than most people ever imagine. You might not move your body around, but thereās grueling, dynamic labor going on inside you. Everybody uses their mind when they think. But a writer puts on an outfit called narrative and thinks with his entire being; and for the novelist that process requires putting into play all your physical reserve, often to the point of overexertion.
The remaining majority of writers who canāt reach such heights (including me, of course) have to supplement whatās missing from their store of talent through whatever means they can. Otherwise itās impossible for them to keep on writing novels of any value. The methods and directions a writer takes in order to supplement himself becomes part of that writerās individuality, what makes him special.
Since Iām a writer with limitsāan imperfect person living an imperfect, limited lifeāthe fact that I can still feel this way is a real accomplishment. Calling it a miracle might be an exaggeration, but I really do feel this way. And if running every day helps me accomplish this, then Iām very grateful to running.
What I mean is, a personās mind is controlled by his body, right? Or is it the oppositeāthe way your mind works influences the structure of the body? Or do the body and mind closely influence each other and act on each other? What I do know is that people have certain inborn tendencies, and whether a person likes them or not, theyāre inescapable. Tendencies can be adjusted, to a degree, but their essence can never be changed.
Seeing a lot of water like that every day is probably an important thing for human beings. For human beings might be a bit of a generalizationābut I do know itās important for one person: me. If I go for a time without seeing water, I feel like somethingās slowly draining out of me. Itās probably like the feeling a music lover has when, for whatever reason, heās separated from music for a long time. The fact that I was raised near the sea might have something to do with it.
Fatigue has built up after all this training, and I canāt seem to run very fast. As Iām leisurely jogging along the Charles River, girls who look to be new Harvard freshmen keep on passing me. Most of these girls are small, slim, have on maroon Harvard-logo outfits, blond hair in a ponytail, and brand-new iPods, and they run like the wind. You can definitely feel a sort of aggressive challenge emanating from them. They seem to be used to passing people, and probably not used to being passed. They all look so bright, so healthy, attractive, and serious, brimming with self-confidence. With their long strides and strong, sharp kicks, itās easy to see that theyāre typical mid-distance runners, unsuited for long-distance running. Theyāre more mentally cut out for brief runs at high speed.
Not to brag, but these girls probably donāt know as much as I do about pain. And, quite naturally, there might not be a need for them to know it. These random thoughts come to me as I watch their proud ponytails swinging back and forth, their aggressive strides. Keeping to my own leisurely pace, I continue my run down along the Charles.
Basically I agree with the view that writing novels is an unhealthy type of work. When we set off to write a novel, when we use writing to create a story, like it or not a kind of toxin that lies deep down in all humanity rises to the surface. All writers have to come face-to-face with this toxin and, aware of the danger involved, discover a way to deal with it, because otherwise no creative activity in the real sense can take place.
But those of us hoping to have long careers as professional writers have to develop an autoimmune system of our own that can resist the dangerous (in some cases lethal) toxin that resides within. Do this, and we can more efficiently dispose of even stronger toxins. In other words, we can create even more powerful narratives to deal with these. But you need a great deal of energy to create an immune system and maintain it over a long period. You have to find that energy somewhere, and where else to find it but in our own basic physical being?
If possible, Iād like to avoid that kind of literary burnout. My idea of literature is something more spontaneous, more cohesive, something with a kind of natural, positive vitality. For me, writing a novel is like climbing a steep mountain, struggling up the face of the cliff, reaching the summit after a long and arduous ordeal. You overcome your limitations, or you donāt, one or the other. I always keep that inner image with me as I write.
As I suspect is true of many who write for a living, as I write I think about all sorts of things. I donāt necessarily write down what Iām thinking; itās just that as I write I think about things. As I write, I arrange my thoughts. And rewriting and revising takes my thinking down even deeper paths. No matter how much I write, though, I never reach a conclusion. And no matter how much I rewrite, I never reach the destination. Even after decades of writing, the same still holds true. All I do is present a few hypotheses or paraphrase the issue. Or find an analogy between the structure of the problem and something else.
Competing against time isnāt important. Whatās going to be much more meaningful to me now is how much I can enjoy myself, whether I can finish twenty-six miles with a feeling of contentment. Iāll enjoy and value things that canāt be expressed in numbers, and Iāll grope for a feeling of pride that comes from a slightly different place.
All I have to go on are experience and instinct. Experience has taught me this: Youāve done everything you needed to do, and thereās no sense in rehashing it. All you can do now is wait for the race. And what instinct has taught me is one thing only: Use your imagination. So I close my eyes and see it all. I imagine myself, along with thousands of other runners, going through Brooklyn, through Harlem, through the streets of New York.
Iād always thought I was sort of a brazen person, but this issue with hyperventilating made me realize a part of me was, unexpectedly, high strung. I had no idea how nervous I got at the start of a race. But it turns out I really was tense, just like everybody else. It doesnāt matter how old I get, but as long as I continue to live Iāll always discover something new about myself. No matter how long you stand there examining yourself naked before a mirror, youāll never see reflected whatās inside.
Through experience you learn how to compensate for your physical shortcomings. To put it another way, learning from experience is what makes the triathlon so much fun.
From out of the failures and joys I always try to come away having grasped a concrete lesson. (Itās got to be concrete, no matter how small it is.) And I hope that, over time, as one race follows another, in the end Iāll reach a place Iām content with. Or maybe just catch a glimpse of it. (Yes, thatās a more appropriate way of putting it.)
Each time I wrote more Iād ask myself, Soā whatās on my mind right now?
I didnāt want to write too much about myself, but if I didnāt honestly talk about what needed to be said, writing this book would have been pointless. I needed to revisit the manuscript many times over a period of time; otherwise I wouldnāt have been able to explore these delicate layers.
The title of this book is taken from the title of a short-story collection by a writer beloved to me, Raymond Carver, What We Talk About When We Talk About Love.